The manuscripts received by the editorial office of the journal and meeting the formal requirements, design requirements and the indicator of originality based on verification through the plagiarism check system, are sent for further review without fail.
If the author (s) of the manuscript has a conflict of interest with other scientist (s), he (s) must indicate the existence of such a conflict of interest in the covering letter, in order to avoid sending this manuscript to the specified scientist (reviewer) and biased evaluations of the manuscript. After receiving the conclusions from the reviewers, the scientific editor sends them to the author for correspondence without specifying the data of the reviewers, for responding to comments, making appropriate changes and resubmitting the manuscript via the electronic platform. The author (s) may, without explanation, refuse to respond to comments, make changes to the manuscript and send it back to the editorial office of the journal "Vestnik KazUEFIT".
After responding to all the comments, making changes to the manuscript to eliminate the comments of the reviewers and re-sending it to the editorial office of the journal, the scientific editor sends all the materials to the reviewer(s) for re-review. If the reviewer provided a negative conclusion on the manuscript, then the manuscript is sent by the scientific editor to another reviewer or a member of the editorial board who is a specialist in the subject of the manuscript. If this reviewer or a member of the editorial board provides a positive opinion, the final decision on acceptance / rejection of the publication of the manuscript is taken by the scientific editor of the journal "Vestnik KazUEFIT". In the case of two negative reviews, the manuscript deviates from publication in the journal. The materials of articles rejected by the editorial board based on the results of peer review are not used by the editorial board for their own purposes. Deputy Editor-in-Chief or Scientific Editor notifies the author for correspondence about the refusal to publish, and sends the opinions of the reviewers.
Manuscript reviews are stored for three years in electronic format on the journal's electronic platform. The period for reviewing is appointed by the scientific editor and the period for consideration of the manuscript by the reviewers is no more than two months from the date of sending the material to the reviewers.